COVID-19 Requires Optionized Supply Chain

I have been discussing supply chain disruption for quite a while now as it relates to consumer demands and natural events such as destructive weather. The COVID-19 pandemic now adds a new and even more real, and more serious, disruption that must be addressed. The key underlying challenge is how to address disruption and especially extreme disruption. We have already entered into a time of extreme discontinuous disruption that demands and absolutely requires immediate response to survive and support the demands created from the disruption. We can no longer ignore the disruption cycle and as a result must focus now on an optionized supply chain rather than an optimized supply chain so the response can be supported through pre-planned actions. The critical requirement is to continue the supply chain and minimize disruption through a robust risk sense and respond strategy. This risk management strategy must become a critical aspect to the supply chain management overarching strategic plan.

The global supply chain is a fact of life now and as a result of the length of time this supply chain has been developing, it is now the norm. Frankly, it would require an unreasonable length of time and money to change, and most importantly, the cost would never be recovered. We must look past the angry demands to move manufacturing ‘back to the US’ and instead take a more reasonable approach to accept and plan for disruption and then develop options and practices to quickly and efficiently adjust to disruption. This means adding an enhanced risk analysis and risk management strategy to the supply chain planning and forecasting tool kit. We must now focus on disruption scenario planning and response option development to ensure that we are able to minimize the impact to the supply chain.

The good news is that we already have practices and tools available to enable disruption options risk analysis and determination. The current state of supply chain software with the addition of big data analytics provides the framework for a robust early risk warning capability to allow implementation of options to address the disruption. We must develop the strategy now utilizing the framework of available tools to support the process. The result of this initiative will be a framework of process and procedures that will allow the extended supply chain partners to sense and respond to disruption based on scenarios and options that have been identified previously.

The challenge with implementing the disruption sense and respond risk analysis framework is not the supply chain management tools. These tools are quite robust and provide the capabilities to adjust quickly and efficiently to the disruptions in a truly efficient manner. These tools over the years have progressed to a state of flexibility in configuration capabilities that is truly quite amazing. The flexibility and configurability has been built into the software to allow a super user to support standard and general maintenance requirements without support of an engineer or software developer. These configuration capabilities I believe are quite capable to support the demands of the ‘optionized’ supply chain to support the risk sense and response framework.

The challenge now from a technology perspective is related to sensing and identification of the risk in a timeframe that allows the supply chain to identify and then implement the appropriate configuration options to manage and flourish during and (most importantly) after, the disruption event. Fortunately, big data and analytics has reached a state that is beginning to support the requirements to sense and determine how to respond to the disruption based on a predetermined business continuity plan. The analytics requires an efficient tool in order to bring the data together from disparate sources into a pool where the analytics can be utilized. This is one of the new continuing supply chain management requirements.

This leads to the next challenge which is to define a robust and flexible business continuity plan that provides suggestions for predetermined options based on the type of disruption. This business continuity plan takes on new meaning and also new use in the supply chain. This plan must be extended first to identify any type of business and supply chain disruption that may occur and then identify the potential for the disruption (risk) along with configuration options to react and adjust to the disruption. In my experience, the business continuity plan has been reviewed at a minimum and normally on an annual basis. The review process must be more rigorous and reviewed more frequently in order to provide the flexibility and direction required to address disruption.

I suggest a two-pronged focus on the review of the business continuity plan to extend the types of disruption and the potential impact along with identification and implementation of a data analytics tool that supports efficient and flexible identification of disruption early. It is most important to identify the potential for disruption so that you can react early and adjust to address the disruption prior to serious supply chain impact. The key focus must be the big data analytics in order to sense and respond to the disruption. Disruption is a way of life now, it is critical to manage the disruption in a way that limits the supply chain disruption.

Tom Brouillette

Contact: tbrouillette@ncspartners.com



@ncspartners

Supply Chain Strategy For COVID-19 VUCA

While the COVID-19 pandemic is certainly the most significant disruption that the world is facing, it is by no means the only disruption the world and especially the supply chain is facing.  In fact, the level of VUCA (Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity and Ambiguity) has increased over the last 5 - 8 years through a series of natural disasters, political unrest and most recently of course the pandemic.  What we must learn is not how to address specific disruption events, we must instead develop a strategic plan that identifies potential disruption events that may or may not occur and then identify potential responses that can be selected singly or grouped to respond to the disruption.  

This VUCA response strategy is simply a more robust business continuity plan.  This is dramatically over-simplified, I understand, however what I am focused on is the definition of continuity which has been an established practice for a long time.  This VUCA response strategy requires a more robust process that defines every type of response for every type of disruption that would then be reviewed on a regular basis to validate and update.  This enhanced response strategy must be incorporated as part of the regular continuous improvement process to analyze not only potential process improvement but also potential disruption.  The risk analysis must become part of the regular process for the business and especially the supply chain to allow for a well thought out response that will reduce the impact of the disruption.

I know that many think - how can you evaluate potential risk of a disruption such as a pandemic?  The evaluation is not based on any specific type of risk, it is based on potential impact if and when any service, supplier (especially raw materials or parts suppliers in manufacturing), transportation partner or customer is suddenly shut down.  Another very critical aspect to the risk analysis is the impact sudden changes in package quantity when specific areas of demand are impacted.  For instance, when institutional demand dried up as a result fo COVID-19 and dairy farmers were forced to discard milk.  The risk analysis and continuity planning must focus on the areas of impact and not the impact event in order to be effective and support the needs of your business. 

The continuity analysis and planning must be planned and executed as a continuous process that is reviewed on a quarterly basis and the events that can impact the business must then be reviewed to confirm that the potential impacts are still valid and also review and the response is still valid and most importantly, the triggering events analysis and review process is still valid.  With the increase in business threatening disruptions it is critical to get ahead of the events as much as possible so that the reaction to the event can be triggered in a time frame that will control and limit the impact of the disruption.  The best time to plan for the response to a disruption is before the disruption occurs!

We have entered into a time of VUCA that will continue to impact professional practices and capabilities and then this will carry over into the personal side as well.  Everything is connected and there is a ripple effect across industries that must be anticipated.  It is no longer acceptable to say - who would have expected this type of disruption?  We all must be prepared for disruption of any kind that may occur and then have a response planned and ready to implement.