RPA As Transitional Bridge To Digital Transformation

Digital transformation is a wide ranging and disruptive strategy that realistically will take years. This strategy will also define the framework that will regularly and continuously replace technology tools based on the changing demands and continuous waves of disruption in the market. You must accept and support this concept in order to be successful in developing a resilient supply chain that is capable of suppurting these transformation efforts. You must accept that there will always be strategic digital transformation initiatives that will focus on areas of greatest return in value. Maybe most importantly, this does not mean that you can afford to only focus on a small number of areas because you will be left behind in the dust of market disruptions.


This means that you must develop a method that will allow you to ‘bridge’ the gap between your current legacy technologies and new technologies that result from market and consumer disruption. One very robust method to bridge the gap is RPA because RPA technologies will allow you to automate processes through the use of technology tools that ‘bolt on’ integration and work flow management capabilities to legacy technologies. There are many examples of these capabilities that bring great value very quickly to your business that will allow you to focus on other strategic initiatives.


I think of RPA as a key tool in your continuous improvement process that will allow you to quickly and efficiently prove out your automation initiatives and strategy. We can no longer afford large initiatives of wholesale change and hope they meet the initiative objectives. We must have a way to prove out the process quickly and RPA provides the tool to support a more resilient and flexible supply chain.


I hear many people stating that RPA is ‘just’ a new and updated method of the old screen-scraper technology from the 90’s in an effort to detract from the technology and encourage the focus on what they feel a better long term capabilities. I am afraid that this focus on the ‘perfect’ will delay the ‘good’ of value delivered quickly through RPA. This strategy is a recipe for failure in these times of continuously changing demands and waves of market disruption. The best course is a focus on resilience and flexibility to sense and respond quickly to the disruption.


My feeling regarding this view is that we do not have time to only focus on the perfect because, quite frankly, perfection will never be achieved. There will always be the new market or customer demand, the new technology, the new application, the new business process that will require inclusion in your strategy and your operation. The focus on perfection will lead to a business failure to meet the demands of your customer and this failure will cause you to lose customers.


Instead, focus on speed of delivery using bridge technology that will allow you to prove the concept prior to a large investment. This is the space where RPA will shine and you can move your business forward while implementing a more long term solution. The first step then is to define your resilience strategy that identifies your weakness in resilience and then use this information to select and utilize a robust RPA tool.


Tom Brouillette

Contact: tbrouillette@ncspartners.com

@ncspartners


Thank you for reading my post on Linkedin in addition, Here at my blog I regularly write about management and technology trends. To read my future posts on LinkedIn click 'Follow'


Tom Brouillette discusses supply chain trends and provides strategic business & technology advice to his followers and companies.

Supply Chain Reshaped By COVID-19 Disruption

There is no question that the Coronavirus has disrupted the world and in the face of all this disruption, the supply chain is being reshaped in reaction to the waves of disruption started by this pandemic. It is safe to say that the world social and economic order has been turned upside down during this time in reaction to the speed and the range of disruption driven by this virus. There has been no area left untouched at this point and the focus is on reaction and adjustments in reaction to the disruption. This requires more than ever extreme flexibility and robust collaboration and communication to sense and respond to the disruption.

I firmly believe that one of the key strengths developed over the years on the extended supply chain is the ability to sense and respond to disruption in a manner that efficiently identifies disrupting factors and resolves through a robust process of continuous improvement. The baseline tools, practices and procedures are in place to respond to the disruption and these have really been the foundation framework that has helped the supply chain to respond and continue to support the market.

The question now is - What process and procedures should be incorporated to allow the extended supply chain to support the multi-faceted waves of disruption that will continue?


These are some key factors that will support the velocity and impact of disruption:

First and foremost is robust, open and holistic collaboration practices. This is key to the ‘sense’ process in sense and response to the disruptions. This requires open sharing of information collected from all quarters in order to better understand relationships and impact of the disruption. Without the collaborative practices the response portion of sense and respond runs a great risk of reaction to the wrong cause of the disruption.

Data collection and analysis provides the information and identifies the relationships that are driving the disruption. There is really nothing new to the level of importance of data in the ability to first sense the disruption and then determine the cause and identify a reaction to the disruption.

Define and implement actions and change based on the data analysis in response to the disruption. One key to the implementation of change is the realization and acceptance that there is no silver bullet that will address the disruption. The disruption is fluid and the changes and reaction must be fluid as well!

The reaction in the system to the change must be reviewed and validated to confirm the response to the change provided a positive impact. This is starting the process over again.

Finally, the most important factor now is speed of reaction! This means multithreading reactions and actions with the analysis of the data. There are two key tool in this time to analyze reactions; the use of Artificial Intelligence and robust collaborative practices.

The guiding factor in this time of disruption must be ‘Don’t Panic and Respond to Data’! This will be the most difficult and greatest time of disruption and when you add the cultural and health disruption to this business disruption the impact can initially seem overwhelming. In order to overcome this feeling we must identify a program that includes a process of actions to address the disruption. We should be using the experience gained over the recent years driven by business and consumer disruption in order to meet the demands of the current disruption.

Robotic Process Automation And You

Robotic process automation is a capability segment that is growing quickly in large part because of the speed in which it can be delivered with limited risk. This is a natural progression to the growing autonomous automation capabilities including robotics. This next logical step of business process improvements combines business process analysis and improvements with software robots identified and driven by artificial intelligence tools and workers. Combine the potential benefits with the limited risk and the robotic process automation provides a very alluring opportunity to quickly add benefits and efficiencies to processes in the operation.



The challenge in the operation is continuous pressure on improvements in efficiencies; to do more work with less human interaction. Unfortunately for the operation, and logistics in the supply chain, robotic implementation can be very disruptive because of the dramatic change to the operation. This is where robotic process automation can bring value to automate the existing process without dramatic disruption. This will provide the opportunity to improve efficiencies while the disruptive projects can be implemented. In fact, I would suggest that robotic process automation be viewed as the first step in a robotic strategy because it provides the first step to proving the automation.



Within the operation the greatest disruption is brought about by the dramatic and sudden change that is demonstrated by physical robotic implementation in the warehouse operations. Robotics not only disrupt the operation and the process and flow of people and operations, it also disrupts the physical layout of the warehouse resulting from the robotics implementation. While there have been dramatic increases in efficiencies, volume and accuracy this must be tempered, initially at least, with the disruption in the warehouse. Don’t get me wrong, I’m a strong advocate of automation to improve the operation, I am only saying you must go into this with eyes wide open to understand and plan for the holistic impact to the operations.



Robotic process automation allows for a trial at increased automation to improve the efficiencies of the operation without dramatic change. This is a benefit not only to the operation, it is also a benefits strategic planning by providing a point of validation for the automation. This is a critical benefit because of the investment required for increased automation with autonomous robotics. The resulting increased efficiencies delivered by robotic process automation allow for a refocus by the operation to more complicated processes that may be more difficult to automate or require autonomous robotic automation.



Automation is a multi-faceted opportunity for improvement and must be viewed as such in strategic planning and strategic initiatives. The organization and operation especially must evaluate options based on the process and automation opportunity, all processes will not achieve improvement from the same automation tool. This is why it is so important to implement a robust and forward thinking strategic planning process to help identify the improvements.



Automation is another flavor of process evaluation and improvement that brings a new set of tools to the toolbox. It must be remembered that these tools excel in different scenarios and situations and the strategic planning process must be a focus to incorporate these new tools as appropriate. This incorporation of new tools is critical to the long term success of an organization and especially now considering the velocity of disruption. There is no time to wait and see how others use the tools. The key to success is embracing a strategic process that experiments and looks toward incremental change to stay ahead of disruption. Disruption is the tipping point of incremental change, unfortunately it is tool late to react to disruption and best case scenario is creating your own disruption.

Data Analytics And Artificial Intelligence Driving Disruption

One of the most critical capabilities to responding to change and disruption in the marketplace is the ability to sense the change in a manner and, most importantly, timeframe that allows a response to be identified and executed. The frequency and discontinuous nature of change rocking the market requires a robust process that takes into account as many factors as possible to identify the change. This process then must describe factors and relationships to allow them to be analyzed to develop the response. The difficulty lies in the volume of data, both new and old, that must be taken into account to first identify the change and second to guide in determining a response. This is where data analytics practices utilizing artificial intelligence comes into the equation to support the business.

The two challenges; data for analytics and the actual analytics require a thoughtful strategy and approach that will allow you to sense the demands from the market in both a manner and a timeframe that will meet the velocity of change requirements. These challenges go hand-in-hand as two sides of the same coin; you cannot sense the change without a great deal of data to analyze and you cannot analyze the amount of data without the artificial intelligence to process large amounts of data.

From the data perspective it is very fortunate that the big data tools and storage technology has advanced to the stage were the collection and maintenance of the data is no longer an issue. This allows the collection of vast amounts of data available from all points of the supply chain and especially from the eCommerce channels. This data along the supply chain can now easily be captured for detailed analysis and because of the volume of data available the results of the analytics can be more accurate and more informative of trends. The important point here is the collection of data from the viewpoint that the more data the better because you never know where the analysis will take you and in order to come to a conclusion you must have the data to analyze and also prove the concept.

Ten years ago, in the early growth stages of big data, the challenge was the ability to collect and store the amounts of data for analysis and the analytic query tools to quickly perform the analysis. This required careful review of the data available to select the appropriate elements that you believed were necessary to produce the analytic results. Then the data collection required over night collection and the analytics were run to produce large reports in a daily schedule. Everything took time and you had to be careful to analyze the expected outcome. Now though because of the dramatic improvements in the technology the process and results are much more robust and immediate. Now there is no concern about the amount of data and the queries themselves are also much more interactive.

The analytics of the data presents the challenge in this equation and this is where the focus should be placed now. Artificial intelligence tools really come into play from this perspective to provide a value add to the equation. Artificial intelligence and machine learning will be a baseline requirement to allow the market to sense and then determine how to respond to the changing demands. These tools will are necessary to first sense and understand the demands of the market and then these same tools will provide the means to analyze the potential solutions and even forecast the impact to the market of change.

The key benefit of these tools is the speed of analytical results and then combine that with the delivery speed of a solution. Speed of sensing the demand and then speed of response are the objectives that must be front and center for the market and the participants in the market. All indicators based on technology lead to increased speed of demands and resulting disruption in the market and market participants will not have the time required for any manual analysis of these trends. In addition, only failure will come from participants that wait for the market to deliver a solution that they can adopt.

The participants that embrace artificial intelligence combined with machine learning will be the players that succeed and prosper in the market. The rate of failure that we have seen in the market will only increase as the velocity of changing demands increase. The good news is the building block tools to quickly and efficiently sense and respond to the increased velocity of changing demands are already available. The bad news is that the market participants must embrace the tools to develop their own practices to use the tools.

Market Technology Transformation

Disruption in the market is now being driven to a very large extent by technology and this technology transformation is being led by the demands on the supply chain from consumers on the market. In all aspects of the market we are seeing a transformation that is being driven by the changing lifestyles of consumers. These changing lifestyles are, to a very large extent, enabled by technology that is available to consumers in every aspect of their daily activities. Consumers have embraced technology in every aspect of their daily activities and the impact on their lifestyle has been dramatic in the opportunities to meet their changing demands. This presents a challenge to the extended supply chain partners to support the market transformation that is driven by changing technology.

The most obvious example of technology that has dramatically impacted consumer lifestyles is the smartphone. Consumers have embraced the smartphone in every aspect of their daily activities to enable them to meet their changing lifestyle. These demands have transformed the methods in which they communicate, shop, pay bills and share experiences. The smartphone, in combination with improvements in wireless network technologies, are key factors in the market transformation and this transformation is only increasing in velocity. I know in my own activities that this technology has transformed my ability to meet the daily demands of family and career to allow me to blur the line between all activities; I can shop any time and then plan for delivery to meet the immediate demands, I am available for response any time the need arises whether personal or work related and the technology allows me to react based on the demand.

Technology has become pervasive across all activities and this has transformed the consumer market into an expectation of 24/7 shopping and delivery to meet the demands at the time. These demands have required the transformation of the extended supply chain to quickly and efficiently address the demands first and foremost. Most importantly this has required the transformation of the extended supply chain to develop the methods and processes to quickly and efficiently sense and respond to the changes. The transformation requires not only efficient response to new demands but experimentation with capabilities to create new consumer demands. The velocity of transformation has reached a level where the ability to react to demands is not enough to maintain share in the market participants must anticipate demand before consumers realize in order to maintain share.

Experimentation can be frustrating because of the potential for mistakes and failures. However, the market is changing at such a velocity that there is no choice but to experiment with creating future demands. This is especially difficult in the retail market because the culture and accepted practice is at odds with leading edge experimentation. We are seeing now though especially with Amazon and niche eCommerce retailers the rise of experimentation as a key capability. This transformation has dramatically impacted large legacy retailers causing failures and a struggle to keep up with the changes. The market is now seeing early signs of leading retailers such as Target or Walmart finally transforming their practices to leverage the multi-channel marketplace to transform their business.

Change has been supercharged into transformation and consumers are driving the retail market into continuous transformation that requires new methods and processes to anticipate demand rather than react to the demands. These processes must support faster and more flexible adjustments that are driving continuous transformation of the market. We have reached a point with technology where the speed of change requires anticipating and adjustments rather than sense and respond. This will further shake out the market and drive transformation in the supply chain.

Collaboration In Time Of Disruption

I see conversational commerce as a major disrupter coming to the retail marketplace and while the retailers that have been focused on AI and data analysis will be the retailers that are best prepared sense and respond to the changing demands of the market, there is also no question in my mind that collaboration is critical to the ability to execute on the demands. Collaboration will increase in importance in the future markets because there is no way that a single partner can respond to all of the changing demands of the consumer. The extended supply chain is probably the key to the success of supporting the market demands. These demands can only be met through a robust collaborative network in the extended supply chain.




The extended supply chain is in a unique position in this disruption because of the previous work building a collaborative network that supports the ability to sense and respond to the changing demands in a global marketplace. This experience has forced the extended supply chain network to develop a strong collaborative network of partners that support the demands and provide a connected network of partners that provide point solutions to meet the demands. This is the ‘secret sauce’ of the supply chain collaborative network. This collaborative network provides the framework for point solution providers to flourish because the connectivity framework is already available for the solution providers to market and deliver services. This was an unintended benefit from the work to develop a robust collaborative network; the framework to support share support of the global supply chain demands and encourage point solution development to rapidly deliver solutions to the partners.




The disruption of the global market demands was a precursor in the extended supply chain to the disruption the retail marketplace is beginning to experience now. This disruption will roll through the retail marketplace in a manner similar to the global marketplace disruption on the extended supply chain and the smart players in the marketplace will be incorporating the lessons learned from the global market disruption to build a collaborative network that supports the speed of change necessary to meet the demands. This means embracing network capabilities that encourage and support the point solution model developed in the supply chain. I believe this is the single most important key to supporting and even encouraging the disruption in the retail marketplace.

Disruption is not a point that impacts only the retail market or only the extended supply chain.  Disruption is a cumulative effect that builds on past change and disruption to redefine the market and I believe that we have reached a ‘perfect storm’ point in time where the demands and expectations of consumers, and market partners are being driven by technology and the converging of technology capabilities, embrace of the capabilities and lifestyle demands imagination of consumers and market partners to build a new marketplace that eliminates channels and the lines between channels to produce a new marketplace. 

Market Collaborative Forces

The supply chain partners realized a long time ago that they would need to collaborate across the entire extended supply chain in order to support the demands of the global supply chain. Retailers are now slowly coming to the realization that they will need to collaborate across the entire marketplace in order to support the demands of the retail omni marketplace. These retailers are dragged into the ‘new’ world of collaboration ultimately across all partners that participate in the market and we see many failed and failing retailers across the marketplace that have either failed to recognize the signs or more often than not have simply refused to recognize and embrace the collaborative practices that can help to maintain their viability. Now retailers are stuck in their legacy practices of waiting for technology and practices to solidify before choosing a path and more wrong-headed view of the importance of individualism in retail practices.




The supply chain players and partners have a distinct advantage in this new disruptive market because the supply chain went through a major disruptive re-awakening twice;


When the global supply chain came into prominence in the 80’s and 90’s. This was the first major wave that drove the supply chain into the collaborative network practices that allow them to quickly sense and respond to changing demands and disruptions in the supply chain.


During the great recession when the supply chain underwent major labor disruptions that disrupted the labor market as a result of cost reductions. This created a new focus on the third party logistics market as engineers were released by retailers and landed in the 3PL market. This move of expertise created a dearth of expertise in retailers and move of this expertise to 3PL providers.




The good news for retailers is that they can partner with their own supply chain to help in developing out the practices and capabilities that will help them to sense and respond to the disruptions that are now pummeling the market. The foundation to success in the retail market is the same formula and foundation the supply chain developed in response to the supply chain disruptions; collaboration, imagination and the extended network. The difficulty now for retailers is the need to accept the new model of collaboration to support the market.




This new or expanded model of collaboration for retailers will be a difficult change because it requires change to culture and generally accepted practices for the larger retailers. These larger retailers have spend many years focused on changes that have been proven and incremental changes that fit with their culture and practices. Now the tables have turned and the market demands sweeping changes in many ways that are so far out of the norm for these retailers that it leaves them struggling with attempts to acquire the capabilities. This is not a winning strategy though because by the time the retailer acquires and implements the new capability the market has moved on to the next two upheavals and the retailer continues to fall behind.

Shift Retail Focus

As the marketplace shifts and the velocity and impact of changes disrupt the retail practices across all channels retailers must now shift their focus from an internalized focus to an external and extended collaborative focus in order to help them sense and respond to the changes. In addition, retailers must not only focus on sensing the changes early on in the market, they must also shift their focus from reaction to action and drive the market change through experimentation. The two practices of extended collaboration to sense the change and experimentation to react to and even drive change must then be combined with a culture change that encourages experimentation and exploring the leading edge. Retailers that are ‘good enough’ will struggle to survive while retailers that push the limits and are not afraid to fail in experiments will succeed and drive the market disruption.




This shift in focus will be difficult form many of the large retailers and will require investment and perseverance to succeed, however, there is really no choice in the matter, the large retailers must change or die. We have seen over the recent years large retailers struggling and failing in large part, I believe, because of their hesitancy to change the culture. The key to this round of market change and disruption is the velocity of change and the discontinuous spurts of change pushing the market disruption. This is is why it is so important for these large retailers to change their culture in order to drive the change in practices required to meet the demand. Rather than reducing spend and closing outlets as a result of lowered sales the retailers may need to close outlets but they should redouble the spend to change and recoup the sales lost.




This is something that I see with JC Penney, they have been pummelled by sales reductions after having tried new strategies and now they have changed their focus to spend on leaders to change their focus in reaction to the market changes. This is probably the best chance for JC Penney to turn around and survive with this change in leadership that brings with it a change in culture. This will only be confirmed though with some time. There are others that have changed leadership that have only continued with the legacy culture with new some new faces. This is basically a retailer experiment in real time that will provide proof of concept for meeting the demands of the new retail marketplace disruptions.




Amazon is still at the heart of disruption and they continuously demonstrate the reasons they remain the leader. Many of the major disruptions continue to be started with Amazon, such as Prime, or the acquisition of Whole Foods, have shown the focus and culture of experimentation demonstrated in real time. This culture of experimentation and collaboration must be encouraged and implemented with other retailers now in order to meet the disruption.

Supply Chain Collaboration

Supply chain collaboration practices will provide the framework and the foundation for the retail extended collaborative practices across the marketplace including partners, service providers and consumers. This is how important these collaboration practices and framework are to retailers in the marketplace. The challenge for retailers is to recognize these capabilities for the critical nature that they represent in today’s retail marketplace and then to take the appropriate actions to embrace and integrate these capabilities as a critical aspect of their shopping and purchasing framework. This is where the partnerships and the culture of collaboration come into play and requires the retailers to recognize these trends and take actions to incorporate and remake their offerings in a way that incorporates collaboration with partners and most importantly with consumers to allow them to sense and respond to the demands of the marketplace.




Most retailers continue to focus on integrating and adding eCommerce type goods and services to their offerings and then integrating these goods and services into the brick and mortar outlets. This was a very valid action to allow these retailers to attempt to catch up to the the consumer in their demands. This practice highlights the fact though that the retailers are still following trends in the market and acquiring companies that have developed the service or offerings after the trend is identified. From this perspective these retailers have not changed their culture or their practices that have been ingrained in the culture over many years - wait for the trend to be proven and then move to incorporate or acquire the trend. The recent trend from retailers now, to acquire the goods or services, has shortened the delivery lead time, however there is still a longer lead time from initial trend to the retailer responding and delivering the goods or services.




These retailers that do not change their practices and culture to one of extended collaboration and add to this a culture of experimentation are doomed to repeat the same cycle of slow failure that many of the large legacy retailers are currently experiencing. These retailers must change their culture to encourage and drive collaboration as a means to support experimentation in both goods and services. The supply chain has experience in this type of market upheaval and can provide support and guidance, along with new services that will support the market demands, if only retailers embrace more open collaborative practices.




Retailers must shift their focus from internalized measures to external collaboration and experimentation in goods and services. These retailers will never catch up by chasing trends and acquiring companies that are supporting these trends and they will also never gain enough time by cutting costs, Retailers must go back to their roots of experimentation and invention rather than following the leader. This is exactly why Amazon has been able to disrupt one market after another, Amazon is the master of experimentation in the retail market and have shown over and over again that they are willing to experiment and fail in the marketplace in order to move forward.

Omni Market Culture

The disruption currently sweeping through the retail marketplace must be met with both sweeping and continuous process change and also sweeping culture changes from the retailers to meet the increasing velocity of change. The scope and breadth of change in the marketplace have reached a level where change in process cannot hope to meet the demands. The culture must change now to commit the resources and focus to increase collaboration and sharing not only between the retailer and extended partners but also with all participants in the marketplace and especially consumers of the market goods and services. Consumers have always participated in the marketplace in a reactionary mode with shopping and purchasing and now these consumers are becoming an integrated partner in the retail marketplace demanding new interactions and services that can only be met through increased collaboration.




Communications and interactions across the marketplace have eliminated the lines between social networks and personal interactions and as these changes increase in velocity and scope across the marketplace there will be more and more pressure placed on the culture to support and adapt to the change. Marketplace disruption is driven to a large extent by communications and interactions across channels, participants, goods and services. This is significant because it is such a divergence from the past. The interactions between all market participants is required to increase dramatically now in order to support the demands of shopping and interactions across all channels. The lines between the online and the brick and mortar realms are being smashed now by consumer demands and the retailers are scrambling to catch up.




The sooner the retailer accepts this new reality the sooner they can begin the change. Since this requires a change in culture it cannot be purchased and must be built internally starting with continuous encouragement from the top leadership to build and grow the culture from the bottom. This is the most difficult type of change to implement because it is a long term initiative that cannot be purchased and the marketplace is filled with short term demands for change. The trick then for the retailers is to accept the fact of the collaboration requirement that carries through each of the demands and then to engage, encourage and develop the culture that supports these demands for collaboration.




The collaborative culture will help the retailers and partners across the marketplace sense and respond to the demands of the marketplace because they will be plugged into the channels that are developing and changing the demands. This is a major change to the ways that the marketplace participants engage and most importantly, the key participants driving the change, consumers, are driving these changes through the social networking and wireless technology tools already available. There is really no choice now for retailers but to engage and focus on the culture that will support the new collaborative demands and interactions from so many different tools. The signs and are now visible across the market and leaders such as Amazon are engaging in all channels to understand and respond to the demands. Large retailers that do not accept and respond to these new types of demands will be left behind and struggle to survive.

Omni Market Strategy

Two of the largest players in the retail marketplace are now in the process of rebuilding their strategies to form the retail market in the image that meets their vision and the two strategies are very different because of where these retailers came from in their growth and development. The origins are driving their strategies to allow them each to leverage their base and also to leverage their customer base practices and expectations. Amazon and Walmart are these two giants in the market and they each bring a very different perspective and direction to their actions and capability delivery. These differences in perspective bring different strengths to their practices and this really sets the tone and the direction based on where the consumers are coming from; whether an electronic focus that bleeds into the brick and mortar or the opposite.




You can see from the differences in strategies and focus that were driven by the base customers allowed these retailers to build their strategic capabilities and now they are each trying to re-imagine their omni market strategy incorporating these baseline strategies and capabilities. This is an extremely difficult challenge for both because it pushes them outside of their comfort zone. This is easy to see when viewing the sales and marketing strategies; they both purchased capabilities in their expansion target channel to help move them ahead and they both are now working to integrate these acquisitions into their omni market strategy. These challenges and reactions by these two leaders showcase the value of experimentation and the willingness to fail forward. They both show a great deal of courage in these reactions and their willingness to spend to experiment.




You can also very clearly see where each of these retailers started and their base comfort zone, whether brick and mortar or eCommerce, and each of these starting points are driving interesting interactions and focus based on each of their starting points. As I mentioned earlier, the most encouraging aspect of these results is the willingness and even the excitement to experiment. Each of these retailers realize the importance of their actions and each have truly embraced the value and concepts of this experimentation to develop the new retail model. Each of these retailers realize they are building the the future and they see the value to being first in the development and delivery of this future.




There is no substitute for this experimentation and each of these retailers has embraced the challenge. They both realize that this experimentation is pushing the boundaries forward in the only manner that can be successful, they must experiment to determine what works and what will be accepted by the consumer. They must experiment in this manner because the market is moving so fast and the forward movement will more than pay for the failures and will provide the lead to allow them to maintain a healthy lead on the competitive advantage. There are many other retailers attempting to focus on their omni market strategy and they are facing these challenges in historical manner where these retailers are taking the safe path of change, waiting on the changes to be a little more solidified. This shows the legacy culture that generally waits for the change to solidify. This culture though will fail this time because of the velocity and breadth of change in the market, the retailers that wait run a significant risk to waiting too long to change and then being too late for success.

Retail Renewal

Spring brings a sense of renewal and the current disrupting forces in the retail marketplace should be viewed as a type of retail spring renewal. Rather than a focus on cutting and reducing expense as a reaction to this disruption retailers should be looking at a renewal of the marketplace into an image and ability to efficiently and effectively support the changing demands of the consumer lifestyle in shopping and purchasing demands. Renewal provides an image of positive change and improvement to deliver on the imagination of the marketplace and this image is important to foster and encourage as opposed disruption that brings the image of cuts and reductions to address a downturn is sales. It is important to view and engage as an opportunity to grow rather than a requirement to cut and wait for some magical upturn in sales to appear.




There is a wide variety of purchasing capabilities that can be utilized to support the consumer lifestyle that have been developed over the years and there does not seem to be a limiting factor from the purchase capabilities. The limiting factor seems to be the transparency and combinations of shopping and purchasing and delivery capabilities available to the consumer from all channels in a true omni market view. This is where the retail disruption, or renewal, is focused and this is the key challenge to the larger retailers. These large retailers must overcome their natural tendency to fall back into the reaction methods from the past. They must overcome their reaction to reduce costs when faced with a downturn and must instead focus on the renew and an analysis to determine the reason for the downturn and then how to react to the downturn to recover the sales. This reaction spells the difference between success and failure in this new retail marketplace.




I saw a report that for the first time online sales have surpassed in store, brick and mortar, sales. This would seem to add weight to the retail marketplace disruption that should be driving renewal activities in the larger retailers. This news should be a little intimidating to retailers because it confirms the forecasts and the direction that has been assumed by many for a while. You could see the coming changes with the large players working to blur the lines between channels to support the omnimarket capabilities that are now coming together. You could also see the coming changes with the extended supply chain service offerings and especially in the drive to simplify the delivery based on the consumer lifestyle.




I see the differences coming together now in many ways and one of the ways is manner in which Amazon is experimenting with omnimarket retail. Amazon is playing their brand across channels and retail market segments to bring a shopping and purchasing experience that focuses on meeting consumer needs across product commodity. This is important and the only other american retailer with a similar type of market coverage would be Walmart and Walmart has been focused on growth in omnimarket to meet the Amazon challenge.

Collaboration Officer

Collaboration has become increasingly important over the years and this importance and increased in depth and breadth of collaboration partners and activities to the point where it is important to create the role of a Collaboration Officer to ensure the necessary focus within the organization. At this point collaboration coordination and activities are much too important to leave to the individual participants and requires a focused and coordinated strategy for both internal and external partners. The marketplace and demands are changing at such a velocity now that no single participant in the market can hope to support all of the demands, driving the types and volume of collaboration activities across the market in order to deliver and maintain new capabilities and services at a rate that supports the demands.




Collaboration as a concept has been in vogue for a very long time and it's been one of those concepts that everyone agrees on the importance while at the same time being challenged in living the concept. Many have talked the talk and found it difficult to walk the walk because collaboration, at least in my opinion, requires a partners to give up some control and this can be very difficult for some leaders. Control for many leaders has been key competency and allowed them to build the concept and brand that has been successful. Now, however, while the concept has not lost importance the implementation of the concept requires flexibility and collaboration to deliver.




I see a cycle in the maturity and success trajectory where the initial concept development requires a focus on the development that is driven by the leader to deliver on the concept. This cycle continues while the concept take hold to ensure the vision is maintained and the concept gains acceptance and traction in the marketplace. This changes though relatively quickly though after a wider acceptance though to require collaboration and new partnerships to retain the success trajectory and also ensure the continued growth of the concept. This change requires a shift in focus to partnership and collaboration and most importantly a shift to a shared success plan utilizing increased collaboration and partnership to continue the success trajectory. You see this type of collaboration and partnership in small businesses and support of the small businesses with a good example being the American Express initiative to support small and local businesses.




This is much different though for the large retailers and legacy partners where they must focus on change to meet the new demands. These entities must out of necessity focus on the collaboration and partnership concepts to maintain their own success trajectory. This is important because these retailers must realize they must sense and respond to support the changing demands on their offerings, shopping and purchasing practices which requires increased and robust collaboration with partners to meet the demands.




The retailers must pivot the majority of their focus on collaboration and partnerships and must build the capabilities utilizing these practices to develop new products in order to maintain their success trajectory. These retailers would do well to support a concept and type of skunk works that encourages and feeds new programs, products and capabilities in a lab type environment that allows and encourages failure in a manner that supports a concept delivery cycle. The large retailers have wasted a massive head start in both creativity and building the delivery cycle by focusing on reductions rather than identification of the next big thing.

Supporting Discontinuous Change

The current retail marketplace experience of discontinuous change causing disruption and in some cases extreme challenges to react should not be a surprise to anyone. In fact, I think the big surprise is the continued dependence of major retailers on historical reactions such as cutting costs to react to the market disruption. This type of marketplace disruption requires a new way of reacting and not just retrenching into more of the same tactics used during market downturns. We are not experiencing a downturn in the market, we are experience an overhaul of the market shopping and purchasing while the market is expanding. These are the most difficult conditions to address and requires investment in rebuilding the retailer business model.





The level of discontinuous change in the retail marketplace has disrupted this marketplace demanding of participants a transparent and cohesive shopping and purchasing experience. The waves of demands have not given the large legacy retailers much of a chance to catch up with the demands and the bad news is that these waves of demands and change will only increase in velocity and impact as they build on the previous changes. This requires a new paradigm from the retail marketplace of participants and partners to support both the level and velocity of the change.





This paradigm change requires a focus on increased and improved capabilities to sense change and, probably most important, a new increased focus on experimentation, especially in meeting change. What has become abundantly clear though is that this new paradigm requires a high level of collaboration across not only partners but consumers as well. This is requires as an integrated plan and partnerships to support not only the necessary activities and practices to sense change, it is also required to support the reaction to the change. Every single change and and especially change leading to disruption requires requires a coordinated response across a multitude of partner to react and support the demands.





In looking back and looking around I do not really see any marketplace disruption that required only one organization to drive, yes there was one leader that recognized the opportunity for change and market disruption, however, that leader then partnered with other participants to support and enable the disruption. The key issue that is see that absolutely must be overcome in order to survive is supporting a robust collaboration model and unfortunately this is the one issue that requires a culture change in the large legacy retailers to enact. In looking around I see many companies that speak about the importance of collaboration and are even taking steps to improve collaboration with their external partners, the issue that I see though is that many of the same larger legacy retailers are still hung up in internal silos that are slowing change through the controls to maintain these silos.





In order to truly support the discontinuous change and the market disruption that will only increase in velocity I believe that the market must create chief collaboration officer that is empowered to seek out and expand collaboration across internal silos while also seeking out and expanding collaboration across their market partners. This is a culture change that will require support of the organization leadership and the best way to broadcast the support and importance is through the creation of a chief collaboration officer that is empowered to make change. This chief collaboration officer will be charged with sensing and supporting the change and disruption in the marketplace and this officer will also be charged with the authority to experiment and the encouragement to fail.

Disruption Culture

The disruption roaring through the marketplace now requires imagination, flexibility and a culture that does not freeze or shrink from the change driving the disruption. This disruption culture requires a willingness and encouragement to experiment and fail while reacting to the change in the marketplace. The key to success in the disruption is the imagination to experiment with new ideas and processes to meet the demands of the marketplace with a goal of creating the disruption in the marketplace. Disruption seems to be the norm, or at least it the changes are greater and increasing in frequency, requiring reactions from the marketplace in order to maintain their place. In the past retailers could wait for the change to solidify before reacting and now they cannot afford to wait for the change to solidify before the next wave of change.




Disruption is identified later in time when the changes have increased in velocity and impact resulting in a broad spectrum change that impacts the marketplace and changes it forever. In other words, disruption is identified when you realize the impact to the marketplace. This is also why it is so important for each participant in the marketplace to react and support the changes in their field. If any one or two of the participants do not support the change they run the very real risk of being left out of the marketplace. In my opinion, this lack of supporting market changes is the key factor for the retail market failures of some of the major retailers recently.




The retail marketplace is now in a time of discontinuous and disruptive change and the only way for the market to react is to develop and encourage a culture of change that embraces and encourages the changes that disrupt the marketplace. That is why it is so important for retailers and the supply chain partners to create a disruption culture that is guided by change and more importantly embraces the change and the resulting disruption. This is not an easy lift because requires the largest partners with the most to lose to be the leaders in the change.




The secret of Amazon and Google and Facebook is that they have developed a disruption culture that searches out change that can disrupt the marketplace and they use this as a way to get ahead of their competition. We have seen this over and over where an upstart enters the market with a new idea and this idea catches fire with the consumer and before you realize it they have disrupted the market and leave the competition behind. This is the point though where especially the largest retailers must focus their resources on sensing and responding to the change. They must realize that they are under attack from the market and the competition and they cannot reduce spending to address the issue, they must refocus their investments on the tools and the culture that will allow them to sense and respond to the changes.

Preparing For Disruption

Disruption is defined as a break or interruption in the normal course or continuation of some activity or process and so you would also assume that this disruption is caused by some time of surprise, unplanned, event that causes the interruption. Then by this definition it is very difficult to plan for disruption, however you can prepare for a disruption by developing flexibility and improved sensory tools to quickly react to the disruption. The challenge then is; how do you prepare for a surprise or unplanned event? Considering the worst case result of the disruption, though it is one of the most important activities for any business and especially for the retail marketplace and the partners and infrastructure supporting the retail marketplace. In short somehow preparing for disruption is at least as important and should receive the same focus and effort as sales forecast and product development.




I say this because disruption by its very definition cannot be planned and as a result there is no way to forecast how or when the disruption will materialize. So the disruption can be in products or sales channel or even marketplace and the disruption ripples across a large number of participants and even other marketplaces impacting process and activities in its wake. We have reached a point though in technologies supporting the marketplace activities and processes that has dramatically increased the partner flexibility capabilities along with the analysis and forecast capabilities that can be incorporated to support the sensory early identification of potential disruptions and allow the partners in the marketplace to quickly adjust in a manner that allows them to react to the disruption and address the interruption.




The focus in the retail marketplace must be on sensing or even creating the next market disruption. This can be achieved through robust collaboration and data analytics. The key though, in my opinion, is the sense potential change and move to react and take advantage of the change. In order to succeed in the response to change the partners must embrace failure and understand that the only way to meet the challenge is through a continuous improvement process of plan, do, check, act, or, trial and error. This process must increase in velocity though in order to reduce the reaction and action timing. The goal of this process is to not just improve the ability and the speed of reaction but to actually help to disrupt the marketplace base on the reactions of the consumers. This, in effect, has been the path taken by Amazon in their market disruption over the years, Amazon has recognized signs from consumers and taken action to react and support the consumer demands.




Unfortunately this is a culture change in addition to the change in process and the culture change will be the most difficult to install. It will require a continuous focus and engagement from all levels and all partners in the marketplace to succeed. However, there really is no other option and the sooner this is realized and embraced, the sooner the disruption will be understood and embraced.

Consumer Change Agents

Consumers control the velocity of change in the marketplace and they are continuously pushing the velocity as a result of change and developments in the wireless and Internet capabilities. Consumers learn quickly to take advantage of the gains in wireless technologies to push the changes in the marketplace to support their lifestyle demands. Now we are on the cusp of another major advance in wireless technology with 5g wireless networking to be delivered in the next year. This new wireless network technology brings the potential to dramatically change the networking and capabilities in a dramatic way and the retail marketplace must prepare to embrace these new demands and capabilities. There is simply no time to waist in preparation for this change because the velocity of change will only increase with the extended networking capabilities.




Consumers have used technology to become leading agents of change in the retail marketplace and the coming wireless changes are going to shift this role into high gear for a period of time. Understand that there is always a difference between the hype of new technology and the reality and this new technology will be no different. The change though opens the door for change that will start with a trickle in the market as the technology forward consumers experiment and will quickly increase to a rush when the new capabilities are flexed and niche vendors deliver trial capabilities. Technology forward consumers and niche vendors will very quickly drive the change into the marketplace and this technology, just like the release of the 4g wireless technologies, will have extreme disruptive impact on the marketplace as consumers quickly embrace the capabilities to support their lifestyles.




The consumer acceptance of the new 5g technologies will be must faster than the 4g technology. Of course it will take some time for contributors to roll out enhanced 5g capabilities, however, the consumer is now prepared and anxious for the change. This time around there is a much larger market of technology savvy millennials that will quickly push the capabilities of the technologies and and also the marketplace. The demands and the consumer capabilities will build quickly pushing the marketplace into another round of disruption.




The market must prepare and brace for this new wave of disruption because it will come with a breathtaking speed that can overcome those that are not prepared. This means that partners must increase their collaboration across all channels. This means that partners must improve and increase their interactions and collaboration with consumers. This means that partners must improve their integration flexibility to support new niche partner integrations quickly and efficiently. The change will start slow but it will grow in volume and velocity very quickly and this will require imagination, collaboration and flexibility from all partners in the market to meet the challenge.

Age Of Disruption

We have entered into an age of disruption in the market and this disruption is fueled by the consumer embrace of technology and especially the explosion of wireless technology. The technology has allowed consumers to reshape their interactions with retail to support their lifestyles and the velocity of this change has been increasing past the point of market disruption. The market partners must realize now and accept this as the new reality. The velocity and volume of change will not slow and will continue to disrupt the market for a long time. This disruption, though, can be addressed through a robust continuous improvement program, or more appropriately, a continuous disruption program. It is more critical than ever to implement a strong process that can sense the direction of change, or disruption, and also identify the most flexible and robust method to address the disruption.




As change velocity and magnitude increases the market disruption also increases to the point of reaching a continuous disruption model that remakes the market on a regular basis. The tensions of this model have been building for a while now and it seems that the technology advances and especially the wireless technology advances have provided the foundation to deliver the disruption that as been in the wings of the market. Market participants can no longer wait for the change to settle an then implement the new standard because the new standard is changing at a breakneck pace. This continuous disruption will require that market participants increase their rate of change to meet the demands or they will be left behind on the periphery if they are lucky. You can clearly see the results of the disruption in the retail marketplace by the increase in the number of bankruptcies.




This requires the market participants to step up their game, especially in the ways that they are collaborating and developing partnerships to meet the demands. The supply chain is leading this integration and partnership drive and has been developing the tools for a while now. The extended supply chain has developed a strong model for implementing the type of network that will allow the entire marketplace to sense and respond to the demands and even help to create the disruptions in the marketplace. The supply chain extended network supports speedy and efficient integration of new partners and encourages specialized service providers to bring new point solutions to support the supply chain demands.




The way to succeed in the age of disruption is not through harder work but through AI technologies to sense change and then a strong collaborative network to react to the change. No single organization can hope to bring the resources and the flexibility of capabilities to address the disruption (maybe Amazon, but that’s another story). This is where the flexibility and capabilities of the extended supply chain network can be viewed as a model for future direction.

Market Repurposing

The market is changing at a breakneck pace an impact on participants in ways that never would have been imaginable just 3 years ago. This is the result of breathtaking advances in technology and especially the network and connectivity of the technology and tools across the marketplace. I live in an urban area and can just look out the window and see the impact of the technology and the connectivity. Add to this the promise of 5g wireless technology and this pace will only increase and the disruption based on the technology will increase as well. This all leads to a focus on market repurposing of technology capabilities and more importantly of real estate and the use of physical locations to extend and provide new capabilities to the brand. There is really no telling right now how the market will look in the next 5 to 10 years but I think it's safe to say that the retail brick and mortar location will be completely re-purposed.




We are in the midst of almost complete market disruption where many of the largest historic retailers are failing in new ways as result of the digital retail competition coupled with consumer embrace of the technology and the opportunity to reshape their shopping and purchasing to meet their lifestyle needs. This change has reached a level of velocity that is most difficult for the legacy retailers to maintain as a result of their need to redesign their services and practices to support the new digital demands of consumers to support their shopping. Another result of the digital disruption is the impact on the brick and mortar stores and malls. You can see the results everywhere with empty malls and store fronts and as the larger retailers are fighting to survive they are also shedding real estate. This leaves new opportunities in the market to address other demands of the market but it will take imagination to re-purpose to meet the digital demands.




Repurposing is an important method recycle and reuse processes systems and most importantly physical structures. Retailers have been very adept at adding new processes and systems to meet the market demands and now these retailers must also become adept and re-purposing processes and systems to quickly and efficiently adapt to the market change. Frankly I don’t see a way that retailers especially can survive the velocity of change and market disruption without re-purposing. Repurposing becomes even more valuable when you extend your capabilities through enhanced and increased collaboration with network partners.




Repurposing is also becoming important in the brick and mortar side of the omni market as well. Real estate re-purposing presents and allows the market to reuse the real estate to better support the changing market demands. As the real life shopping decreases it leaves more time for life style enhanced activities and drives the re-purposing of the real estate landscape. For instance, with the increase in eCommerce sales, the demand for big box stores and brick and mortar outlets is changing and decreasing which provides the opportunity for retailers and malls to repurpose building, perhaps converting large big box stores into direct to consumer fulfillment centers, for instance, or even entertainment centers or even living spaces.

Disruption Includes New And Obsolete

Market disruption, and especially the current market disruption, must include two side, the new and the order or obsolete. This is an extremely important concept for the long term success in meeting the change and in my opinion should be viewed as an opportunity to replace legacy inflexible processes and interfaces with a more flexible and robust framework that can support the velocity of the change. The key to success is in reduced reaction time and this means reduced time to sense the change and then reduced time to react and respond to the change. One of the key limiters to the reaction and response to the change is the technology infrastructure and framework of tools and processes supporting the framework. The actions taken to address obsolete functionality and processes will be large factor in the ability of market partners to react and respond to change from within and outside of the organization.




In my experience, every company or organization is enamored with the new and this is especially true in the social commerce marketplace and you see examples over and over again of organizations acquiring new technology in the omni market space to allow them to provide new sales and delivery options. This is all well and good however these organizations also must obsolete and retire services as well. Again, in my experience, there is less of a focus on the obsoleting process than there is on new service development. This weight of the maintenance for support and also more importantly the cost and effort to take into account the obsolete services and technology required for implementation of new capabilities will quickly overwhelm the organization. In the past, an organization could conceivably implement new capabilities and just stop using the legacy capabilities without much of an impact. In this current market environment though the level of change is only increasing and this will require the retirement and removal of obsolete capabilities and services in order to support the velocity of change.




The challenge now for organizations is how to balance, or include, the effort to retire obsolete capabilities while implementing new capabilities. This can be a bit overwhelming at first because the level of effort required to obsolete and retire capabilities is not included in the organization effort plans and schedules, at least initially. These organizations must quickly overcome these issues in order to incorporate the retirement as part of the new capabilities delivery. This can be addressed by updating the capabilities delivery process and procedures to include the questions initially when reviewing the new capability to identify the legacy services and capabilities that should be reviewed for obsolescence. In my opinion this is the best place to evaluate and also enforces the process and procedures in new development.




Traditionally large legacy organizations focused on the new initiatives and this focus tended to leave at least remnant technology and services after the new product delivery. This practice did not impact the organization when change moved at a slower pace. Now with the increased change velocity turning into market disruption, these organizations must focus on the process to obsolete technologies and services because of the impact these unused legacy technologies have on the ability to delivery new change in the manner and speed demanded by the marketplace.